Float vs Kantata
Kantata (formerly Mavenlink, after merging with Kimble) is a full professional-services-automation platform covering project management, resourcing, budgeting, and business intelligence for larger agencies and consultancies.
Float is a lighter, more focused resource-scheduling tool without Kantata's broader PSA feature set (billing, BI dashboards, deeper financials). Larger consultancies needing an all-in-one PSA platform often choose Kantata, while teams wanting a simpler, dedicated scheduling tool typically choose Float.
Use cases
Use cases include:
- Allocating staff to engagements with real-time load balancing.
- Tracking utilization alongside engagement profitability metrics.
- Aligning project staffing with billable milestones and staffing forecasts.
- Coordinating cross-functional teams across large portfolios.
- Generating reports for executive oversight on resource use and profitability.
Benefits
Float and Kantata address different layers of project execution. Float provides nimble resource visualization for day-to-day planning, while Kantata offers enterprise-grade project profitability and services delivery workflows. The right fit depends on whether the priority is resource allocation efficiency or end-to-end services execution and financial visibility.
- May be a better fit when you need quick staffing decisions and light project accounting.
- Often chosen for organizations with formal services delivery models and revenue recognition needs.
- Plan for integration impact on financial systems when adopting Kantata.
| Feature | Float | Kantata | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resource planning | Visual, flexible | Process-driven | Depends on configuration |
| Project-level analytics | Utilization-focused | Profitability-focused | Plan dependent |
| Engagement management | Light | Core capability | Plan dependent |
| Integrations | Core PM tools | ERP/PS ecosystems | Connector availability varies |
| Forecasting | Capacity-based | Portfolio-level | Depends on inputs |
| Permissions | Role-based | Granular | Plan dependent |
| Time tracking | Basic integration | Integrated | Data readiness matters |
| Scalability | Moderate | Enterprise-ready |
